July 13, 2008

Parable of the Sower

I was just asked by an admitted atheist a question, I will call him Steve. Steve asked: So Dan, you're so fond of the Parable of the Sower, I have some questions about it. (he explained his position)"So, then, who is the sower? Is he not god (or Jesus)?"

Admittedly Steve, there is a joyful glee inside of me when I read that you are actually contemplating Scripture. You are very wise to ponder as to what is being said to us in the Word.

I am humbly trembling as to not fail you with an incorrect/unacceptable answer that pushes you away from more inquiry into God's Word. With kid gloves let me try.

"So, then, who is the sower? Is he not god (or Jesus)?" I believe it is us, as Christians. ** This is really incorrect since the sower is Christ (Matthew 13:37) Yes Jesus is the husbandman, we are "like" the sower, although Jesus gets all the credit. We are to plant the seeds of salvation into the hearts of men. We are told to preach the word in season and out of season (2 Timothy 4:2).

1 Corinthians 1:17 "For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect."

Colossians 1:28 "Whom we preach, warning every man, and teaching every man in all wisdom; that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus:"

2 Corinthians 4:5 "For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus’ sake."

But if I preach the wrong Gospel to you it is I who is in grave danger. I am held accountable.

Galatians 1:8 "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed."

But we must not put the cart before the horse, so to speak, and preach the Gospel to an unrepentant heart. We must till that soil and get it ready. Prepare that soil for the seed of Salvation.

Matthew 7:6 "Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you."

If that prepared heart is ready, that pliable clay can be molded (Romans 9:20-21)

This is one of the main reasons why I don't give the Gospel to you guys that are non-believers. You would throw that Gospel into my face but if you actually showed signs of understanding then I would, then and only then. First you have to understand how you have broken God's Law and broken His Commandments. If you have broken just one of His Commandments then you will spend eternity in Hell for breaking the Law. (James 2:10) I have to get you to understand how wicked you truly are, how wicked we all truly are.

If I can convince you that you deserve hell, just as I do. If it actually concerns you that you would spend eternity in hell and your heart is broken and contrite (Psalm 34:18,Psalm 51:17). I would then give you the Gospel (the Good News).

So let me ask you does it concern you that you will be spending eternity in hell for breaking God's Commandments?

Matthew 13:38 "The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;"

So which child do you want to be? You can make that choice right now because I will let you in on a secret Steve. Your seed hasn't been planted yet. Right now in your life, your soil is being prepared for the seed. Either it will be ready or rocky. That is the great part of the sower parable. We have season after season to get it right. The sun still shines. When you die the light goes out and, as you know, nothing grows in darkness. So as long as that sun shines in your eyes we have a chance to properly prepare that soil.

So come on Steve, does the reality of hell concern you?

July 12, 2008

Atheists Are Satanists?

Or is it, satanists are atheists? In a recent article I just read, there is a custody battle going on between a satanist named Jamie Meyer, and his wife that wants her children to be dropped off at a Christian Church on Sunday so they can attend Church with her.

Meyer is a real winner, with his tattoo showing the "t" in satan's name on his left leg, drawn to look like an upside-down cross. Also, this is Jamie Meyer's second failed marriage. Misty Hoff, his first ex-wife, said he already has alienated his oldest daughter by calling her a hypocrite for her Christian beliefs. What a real man this guy is, Pffft.

But the part that threw me back is what Peter Gilmore, high priest of the Manhattan-based satanism organization said: "Satanism is the world's first carnal religion, Satanists are thus atheists—not devil worshipers—and we see Satan as being a symbol of pride, liberty and individualism, not a deity." (emphasis added)

Wow that sure does sound like the definition of modern secular humanism which is cloaked with the buzz word of atheism. My heart and prayers goes out to those poor children that have to put up with this while just trying to grow up. This is why God gave us the wisdom in 2 Corinthians 6:14 "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?"

The real twist is that the burden is on the ex-wife to show that the religion of satanism was harmful to the children. Really? Satanism isn't harmful? Ah, American freedom, our forefathers would be proud. Atheism isn't harmful? How about guiding people into the eternal lake of fire. Is that harmful enough for you?

Satanists and atheists, arm in arm together forever, inseparable in that unquenchable fire,(Mark 9:43) outer darkness,(Matthew 22:13) a furnace of fire and a place where people wail and gnash their teeth,(Matthew 13:42) and a lake of fire.(Revelation 20:15) where the worm does not die and the fire is not quenched,(Mark 9:48) and where people are in agony in flames.(Luke 16:24)

Perhaps the most terrifying passage in the Bible describing hell says that men will "drink the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed in full strength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever; and they have no rest day and night." (Revelation 14:10-11)

Good luck with all of that atheists, satanists, secular humanists, or whatever you're calling yourselves this week. Please repent before it's too late.

July 7, 2008

No such thing as an Ex-Christian

There is no such thing as an ex-Christian there are only false converts (stony ground hearer). If you can lose your salvation, then what do you do with Romans 8:38-39 or John 10:28-30, where Jesus says he gives eternal life and the sheep will NEVER perish? If you can lose it then Jesus should have said, "and they may perish..." or "they CAN perish." But he said, THEY WILL NEVER PERISH. So, will they never perish? Or can they?

A true Christian cannot turn away from God. Here is why.  

"Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." ~2 Corinthians 5:17

Now look at:

"They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us."  ~1John 2:19

THEY WOULD HAVE REMAINED if they were really Christians to begin with.

Now a question for you. Are you saying that the Spirit begins the work of salvation in us and that we work it out and complete it by remaining faithful? That IS what you are saying, that we get saved and keep it by the effort of our works, right? Check this out:

"O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?" ~Galatians 3:1-3

Jesus taught it. He said those with eternal life will NEVER Perish or leave.

"And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand." ~John 10:28

Well, will they perish or not? Leave or not? Jesus says those with eternal life will NEVER perish or leave Christianity. I believe Him. Do you?

To the Atheists that claim they were once Christians, my buddy asked:

"Since the bible defines a Christian as one who knows God, would you consider yourself to have been a Christian according to the biblical definition?" ~Thomas Bridges

"Your willingness to acknowledge evidence for God is a direct result of your willingness to trust Him." ~ Thomas Bridges

Conclusion:

If you reasoned OUT of Christianity then Jesus was never the Lord of your reasoning, and evidence of your autonomous reasoning...just like Eve. Scripture says you are not yet a Christian but that is what makes me jump and down with joy for you. There is still time! Just don't die.

The Bible is clear in the parable of the sower (explained by Jesus in Matthew 13) not everyone that says Lord, Lord will make it to heaven. There are definitely true and false converts. Not to merely accept Jesus Christ. Jesus doesn't need your acceptance. You need to receive Him and submit to Him as your Lord and Savior.

*7/11/2008 Addition: The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) just sent me an email today that confirms this post so I thought I would share to back up the Biblical view. Be Truly Converted by Henry Morris, Ph.D.



bit.ly/exchristian

July 6, 2008

The Gig is Up!

Run away while you can!

They are on to us now! We might as well pack it up and move to some cave. It appears that University of Wisconsin-Madison biologist Sean B. Carrol has the "ultimate" forensic record of evolution and has wrote a book about it.

He claims that "direct evidence has poured in as to how complex structures, particularly those of animals, are made and evolved."

I didn't even bother to read the book because after all it says "ultimate" forensic record of evolution right on the cover so it must be true. As I was packing our bags I stopped and wanted to see how this could of happened, I wanted to see what believers thought about the book. Was this just another person claiming evolution as fact?

I came across an exhaustive review by Casey Luskin who used to be a geologist doing geological research at Scripps Institution for Oceanography He was more then qualified to review this claim of Carrol's. In Luskin's review titled The Evolutionary Gospel According to Sean B. Carroll Luskin proves what Carroll was doing.

Luskin poetically explains how Carrol used techniques to convince people of his theory. From the beginning of the book review, Luskin claimed "To ensure the reader adopts his own view of evolution, Carroll resorts to scare tactics." Luskin goes on to explain how and where Carrol went wrong and backs everything up with a viewpoint that everyone can understand. You can read the book review yourself but the conclusion of Luskin's review is:

"Sean B. Carroll’s book The Making of the Fittest: DNA and the Ultimate Forensic Record of Evolution makes large promises but fails to delivers. He claims that science will remove “any doubt” about evolution, and he hopes his scare-tactics about a coming environmental apocalypse will convince people to just accept evolution and save the planet. But there’s no valid reason to argue that one must be a Darwinist to accept responsibility for protecting the environment. As a conservationist myself, I don’t need, as Carroll taunts me, to “accept evolution or you won’t ‘think at all’” in order to understand the importance of conserving our natural resources.

While Carroll is a good writer who makes science easy to understand, his book has a politically oriented gospel message which is simple: just believe evolution without any doubt, and we may be saved from environmental catastrophe. But Carroll’s scientific arguments fail to back up his big talk. Carroll’s examples of natural selection’s creative power—animal breeding, peppered moths, or loss of function—fail to impress. His repetition of Darwinist urban legends about computer studies of eye-evolution and heavy reliance upon vague just-so stories about icefish give little reason to turn the head of the informed Darwin-skeptic. Carroll’s discussions of junk-DNA and pseudogenes are interesting, but it is disconcerting that Carroll never mentions that his “use it or lose it” rule implies that if a stretch of DNA has not been lost, then perhaps it’s still being used. His observation that widely diverse organisms often use the same or similar proteins only serves to further confirm my suspicions of common design in biology. Incredibly, Carroll uses these examples to claim he has “eviscerated” intelligent design. The ID-proponent who reads this book will feel very encouraged about the strength of her own position, for Carroll failed to provide any compelling explanations for the primary subject of his book: the evolutionary making of the fittest."


Honey! you can unpack, it was just 'another' false alarm!

Where do atheists congregate and feel at home?

Click on the picture above to see where atheists are concentrated. Since the United States have the least percentage of fractious atheists, I figured I would help them out. Atheists can use this as a guide to moving. They would indeed feel welcomed more, someplace else. It appears that Japan or Vietnam would welcome atheists with open arms, so pack your bags and move to a more God forsaken country, such as these. Keep in mind that the kids in Japan mostly worship American culture so you might feel homesick there.

Tạm biệt (goodbye in Vietnamese)

Do atheists have a sense of humor?

Joke 1:

A young woman teacher with obvious liberal tendencies explains to her class of small children that she is an atheist. She asks her class if they are atheists too. Not really knowing what atheism is but wanting to be like their teacher, their hands explode into the air like fleshy fireworks.

There is, however, one exception. A beautiful girl named Lucy has not gone along with the crowd. The teacher asks her why she has decided to be different.

"Because, I'm not an atheist."

Then, asks the teacher, "What are you?"
"I'm a Christian."

The teacher is a little perturbed now, her face slightly red. She asks Lucy why she is a Christian.

"Well, I was brought up knowing and loving Jesus. My mom is a Christian, and my dad is a Christian, so I am a Christian."

The teacher is now angry. "That's no reason," she says loudly.

"What if your mom was an idiot and your dad was an idiot. What would you be then?"

Lucy paused, smiled and said, "Then, I'd be an atheist!"
_______________________________________________________________
Joke 2:

An atheist was walking through the woods.

"What majestic trees"!

"What powerful rivers"!

"What beautiful animals"!

He said to himself.

As he was walking alongside the river, he heard a rustling in the bushes behind him. He turned to look. He saw a 7-foot grizzly charge towards him. He ran as fast as he could up the path. He looked over his shoulder & saw that the bear was closing in on him.

He looked over his shoulder again, & the bear was even closer. He tripped & fell on the ground. He rolled over to pick himself up but saw that the bear was right On top of him, reaching for him with his left paw & raising his right paw to strike him. At that instant the Atheist cried out, "Oh please God, help me!"

Time Stopped.
The bear froze.
The forest was still.

As a bright light shone upon the man, a voice came out of the sky. "You deny my existence for all these years, teach others I don't exist and even credit creation to cosmic accident." "Do you expect me to help you out of this predicament? Am I to count you as a believer"?

The atheist looked directly into the light, "It would be hypocritical of me to suddenly ask You to treat me as a Christian now, but perhaps You could make the BEAR a Christian"?

"Very Well," said the Voice.

The light went out. The sounds of the forest resumed. And the bear dropped his right paw, brought both paws together, bowed his head & spoke:

"Lord bless this food, which I am about to receive from thy bounty through Christ our Lord, Amen."

_______________________________________________________________

Joke 3:

July 4, 2008

In the cult of science

In a better understanding of current science breakthroughs and truth, I do my best to read quite a bit about the subject. I have noticed a real split in the scientific community beyond creation vs evolution and various evidences of our origin. With presuppositions firmly in place it appeared the scientific community is divided to interpret the data. If a scientist believes in a Creator then the likelihood of interpreting the data properly.* If the scientist doesn't believe in a Creator then they have to shove the data into an abstract box consistent to evolution. *noted, my bias to this subject. I just heard of a label for, off the deep end, science that was intriguing. Pulitzer Prize winner Chris Hedges coined it the 'cult of science' in an interview.

Hedges said in an interview at salon.com "You know, there is nothing in human nature or in human history that points to the idea that we are moving anywhere. Technology and science, though they are cumulative and have improved, in many ways, the lives of people within the industrialized nations, have also unleashed the most horrific forms of violence and death, and let's not forget, environmental degradation, in human history. So, there's nothing intrinsically moral about science. Science is morally neutral. It serves the good and the bad. I mean, industrial killing is a product of technological advance, just as is penicillin and modern medicine. So I think that I find the faith that these people (new atheists) place in science and reason as a route toward human salvation to be as delusional as the faith the Christian right places in miracles and angels."

Mr. Hedges is a Christian and was critical towards radical Christian fundamentalism in his previous book American Fascists. I haven't read that book yet, I would guess that Hedges might of been properly linking 'radicals' with false converts who follow the Bush doctrine of the neoconservative (Neocon) movement. Vastly different then the atheists link the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) to Christianity. Admittedly, I agree when he writes that "Christian radicals" (I would call them 'false converts') are often so consumed with power and wealth they are no longer practicing Christianity in its traditional sense, as a religion focused on compassion and caring for the downtrodden."

Hedges later added in the interview "That's what leads Hitler to try and breed humans and apes to try to create an oversized warrior or to send expeditions to Tibet to find a pure, Aryan race. I mean, that's not science. It's the cult of science, and I think the New Atheists also make that leap from science into the cult of science, and that's a problem."

I do like this man as we share many of the same points of view, he shoots it straight and I love that in someone. His comments sure has sparked my curiosity enough to read his new book "I Don't Believe in Atheists". I will have to wait to see Hedges' points. Science is morally neutral as he states, I might add that science is also objective. But people are subjective and scientists are people. So by proxy, science may be subjective. I would also conclude that science may be morally neutral, but if people are either Christian or evil then one could conclude by proxy, Science, as a community, can be both for the better of mankind and evil. It all depends on their perspective to God. So I agree Hedges, we cannot place our faith in science and reason as a route toward human salvation, but we must place our faith in God for our Salvation. I anticipate your book arrival Mr. Hedges, thanks.  

bit.ly/cultscience

July 1, 2008

In The Evil Home Of The Most Hated Woman In America

Madalyn Murray O'Hair proudly coined herself as the the most hated woman in America in a magazine interview, was best known for suing in 1963 to have prayer removed in the public school system in Murray v. Curlett, ultimately the Supreme Court ruled in her favor on June 17, 1963 and the start, of the religion secular humanism, began their target of the Public School system.

You really believe the School system is better off taking God out of it, huh? It all stems from Murray v. Curlett in 1963, How can you ignore the mathematical statistics of how today's school systems are failing since the removal of prayer, the Bible and God. In the early 60's 1 and 40 had an STD, today that number is 1 and 3. Abortions, drugs, teen pregnancy, subsides, murders, even education, just pick a subject and it can be linked that that faithless day in 1963.

Blindness is not supposed to be a scientist strong point. Look at the evidence and THEN make a conclusion. So how did atheistic globalists movement help the Soviet Union? Blind science has no use at all in this world. The universe points to a Creator, entire populous and even scientist believe this to be true, but the fringe globalist deniers that believe more in their god Richard Dawkins, is delusional.

Madalyn O'Hair founded American Atheists

"There is no God. There's no heaven. There's no hell. There are no angels. When you die, you go in the ground, the worms eat you." ~Madalyn Murray O’Hair

On a side note: “He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.” ~ Adolf Hitler

An American Humanist named John Dunphy, echoed Madalyn Murray O'Hair's tactics, and said in 1983:

"I am convinced that the battle for humankind's future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers who correctly perceive their role as the proselytizers of a new faith: a religion of humanity that recognizes and respects the spark of what theologians call divinity in every human being. These teachers must embody the same selfless dedication as the most rabid fundamentalist preachers, for they will be ministers of another sort, utilizing a classroom instead of a pulpit to convey humanist values in whatever subject they teach, regardless of the educational level--preschool day care or large state university. The classroom must and will become an arena of conflict between the old and the new--the rotting corpse of Christianity, together with all its adjacent evils and misery, and the new faith of humanism." ~“A Religion for a New Age,” published in The Humanist magazine’s January-February 1983 issue.

In 1995 Madalyn Murray O'Hair disappeared suddenly along with her son Jon and granddaughter Robin (daughter of her other son, William J. Murray) Speculation abounded, some atheists wrongly accused Christians of doing such a thing, but it turned out one of her own atheist cronies did it named David Roland Waters.

Waters, who felt he had no moral authority to be held accountable, had previous convictions for violent crimes, there also were several suspicious burglaries during his time working at American Atheists with O'Hair, and he pleaded guilty earlier in 1995 to stealing $54,000 from American Atheists.

Shortly after pleading guilty in a 'Members Only' article, in the American Atheists newsletter, O'Hair detailed every one of Waters' prior crimes, including a 1977 battery charge in which Waters beat his own mother. O'Hair called the incident "especially chilling" and said it "included his beating her with a broom handle, breaking wall plaques over her head, cursing, urinating in her face and demolishing her apartment."

The murder investigation narrowed to David Waters and in January 2001, Waters informed the police that the O'Hairs were buried on a Texas ranch. Waters, serving 60 years, agreed to lead investigators to the grave as part of a federal plea agreement guaranteeing that he won't be charged in the killings. He died of prison of liver decease in 2003.

What was it like to grow up with this woman?

Personally I was raised an atheist and my dad tried to convince me that 'lying for gain' is perfectly alright to do. I never connected with my dad like my other siblings did. I thought he was wrong my whole life. I remember, at age 7, when my mom was going to leave dad if he didn't get rid of the vast playboy collection that he had. He supplied the neighborhood with a plethora of viewing material, one trash night. Needless to say they never made it to the landfill.

O'hair's other son, William J. Murray said: When I was a young boy of ten or eleven years old she would come home and brag about spending the day in X-rated movie theaters in downtown Baltimore. She was proud of the fact she was the only woman in the movie house watching this filth. My mother’s whole life circulated around such things. She even wrote articles for Larry Flynt’s pornographic magazine, Hustler. My mother lived in spiritual death as Paul writes: "But she that liveth in pleasure is dead while she liveth." I Timothy 5:6

The O'Hair's had statuettes of mating animals on virtually every piece of furniture. There was a full cabinet of booze and a refrigerator full of foods high in fat and sugar. They liked to live a life which my mother called "high off the hog".

William J. Murray admitted that toward the end he had lost hope for his mother’s conversion. The last ten years of her life she became even more profane and vulgar as the demons she courted got their final hold on her. The media stopped courting her because of the number of profane words she would use which they had to edit out.

William J. Murray said "My mother was an evil person ... Not for removing prayer from America’s schools ... No ... She was just evil. She stole huge amounts of money. She misused the trust of people. She cheated children out of their parents’ inheritance. She cheated on her taxes and even stole from her own organizations. She once printed up phony stock certificates on her own printing press to try to take over another atheist publishing company. I could go on but I won’t. All the money my mother made in this manner stayed behind. It did not go with her. "For we brought nothing into this world and it is certain we can carry nothing out." I Timothy 6:7

William J. Murray is a self-professed born again Christian who wrote 'My Life Without God' and is heading the William J. Murray Evangelistic Association. He is the chairman of the Religious Freedom Coalition, a socially conservative organization in Washington, D.C. He has been active on issues related to aiding Christians in Islamic and Communist nations.

These days he would greatly like to see creation science taught alongside evolution in public schools. "I think it’s imperative that it is, because the kids are being taught some kind of theory that changes every 10 years. I was taught in school one type of evolution, now the children are being taught another type. Creation science has much more credibility." (Creation 15(2):36–37 March 1993)

He regards as ‘ridiculous’ the idea that an ape-like creature could give birth to a human.

Although his upbringing was negative and tragic, I am pleased that this one apple, like me, fell far from the tree. Thank the Lord! Bless you William J. Murray!

bit.ly/hatedwoman

June 28, 2008

The Great Debate, Young Earth vs. Old Earth

At the request of an atheist named Stan, I am inviting everyone to watch and discuss this debate that we both have watched.

The debate is available on DVD and is titled: The GREAT DEBATE on Science and the Bible The Young Earth vs. Old Earth with Ken Ham, Jason Lisle, Hugh Ross, & Walt Kaiser



Answers in Genesis was nice enough to post the Debate in their media section of their website. To watch the debate CLICK HERE. Please respond with your comments.

June 27, 2008

God Fearing Atheists?

Are these people confused or secretly hiding something? From this article titled Religion survey's God-fearing atheists

I quote "21 percent of the people who say they are atheists but express a belief in God or universal spirit, more than half of those who say they are agnostic express a similar belief."



"More than 90 percent of Americans — including one in five people who say they are atheists — believe in God or a universal power, and more than half pray at least once a day, according to results of a poll released Monday that takes an in-depth look at Americans' religious beliefs." (America's faith deep, nuanced)

The movement of the religion of Secular Humanism is catching on but not to the extent as they would have you believe. I remember a time, back in the 90's, when the Gay community was claiming 10% of America as being gay when the real numbers were around 1-3%. Now 5% claim atheism and is being promoted, but 'in the closet' 1 out of 5 of that 5% are believing in God and some even praying! All the glory to God.



It also appears that atheists are the minority in saying that "In God We Trust" should be taken out in mandated exercises of civic expression.

The atheists here in California wrongly claim: "These phrases represent outdated and government-sanctioned bigotry."

Leith Anderson, president of the National Association of Evangelicals said it best "When a survey says that atheists believe in God it seems obvious that some don't know what an atheist is or who God is or don't much think about logical inconsistency. But we know that lots of people aren't good at taking surveys!

Or maybe some atheists don't believe in God but would like to if they could find a way.

The universality of religion and the quest for God seems to confirm that there is an unsatisfied desire for God in almost all of us. Just because some arrive at an official "no God" philosophical conclusion doesn't mean that the universal desire is satisfied by denial. So, we have 21 percent of atheists who believe and pray anyway."

June 23, 2008

Atheist religion

It seems a group of people in Philadelphia with the religion of 'secular humanism' is promoting there hatred towards God by buying a huge billboard with the price tag of $22,500. On the billboard is a beautiful sky with the question "Don't believe in God? You are not alone."



This fits right into my hypothesis that most atheists seek validation from like minded individuals, for their beliefs, instead of seeking truth.

To the atheist: Look I fully understand that truth always is confrontational, there is always someone on the wrong side of truth. This is a very serious and real subject for us all. If I didn't love you enough to tell you the truth, then I wouldn't. If I truly love you, as I do, then I can only keep pressing you to the point of understanding. It takes far more love to confront then to ignore the situation, perfect love is a constant confronter.

I would rather like to receive a slight nod from God then to seek the applause of the entire world. Atheists, on the other hand, seek the validating applause of like minded individuals as seen on this new attack on God.

They are NOT seeking TRUTH they are seeking VALIDATION. There is a huge difference.

bit.ly/promoteAtheism

A Fresh New Start

Well, since I am getting kicked out of every atheist blogging site I figured I would start combating them in my own yard. Actually I do have a couple of static posts as hermeneutics instructions for others to read but this will be the first time I have blogged on any level.

I will be testing out features, such as video comments, and explore many subjects. This should be very fun with a new start.



I will do my very best to find time to blog at a consistent level and most of these blog subjects will be my reply's to what I read at other blogs that I have been banned at. A new baby is arriving into the family and time will be divided but I will see how often I can do this.