Apologetic Method

Summary On Apologetic Method

Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen

from the book
Always Ready Directions For Defending The Faith

The Nature of the Apologetic Situation:
1. The controversy between the believer and "unbeliever" [*I would think a more accurate term would be "idolatrous denier"] is in principle an antithesis between two complete systems of thought involving ultimate commitments and assumptions. Col 2:3, 8
2. Even laws of thought and method, along with factual evidence, will be accepted and evaluated in light of one's governing presup­positions. Lk 16:31
3. All chains of argumentation, especially over matters of ultimate per­sonal importance, trace back to and depend upon starting points which are taken to be self-evidencing; thus circularity in debate will be unavoidable. However, not all circles are intelligible or valid.
4.  Thus appeals to logic, fact, and personality may be necessary, but they are not apologetically adequate; what is needed is not piece­meal replies, probabilities, or isolated evidences but rather an at­tack upon the underlying presuppositions of the "unbeliever's" sys­tem of thought. 1 Cor 1:20
5. The "unbeliever's" way of thinking is characterized as follows:
a.   By nature the "unbeliever" is the image of God Gen 1:26 and, therefore, inescapably religious; his heart testifies continually, as does also the clear revelation of God around him, to God's existence and character. Rom 1:19, 20, 32
b.  But the "unbeliever" exchanges the truth for a lie Rom 1:25. He is a fool who refuses to begin his thinking with reverence for the Lord Pr 1:7 ; he will not build upon Christ's self-evidencing words Mt 7:26, 27 and sup­presses the unavoidable revelation of God in nature.
c. Because he delights not in understanding but chooses to serve the creature rather than the Creator Rom 1:25, the "unbeliever" is self-confidently committed to his own ways of thought Pr 12:15; being con­vinced that he could not be fundamentally wrong, he flaunts perverse thinking and challenges the self-attesting word of God. Pr 13:16; 1 Cor 2:14
d. Consequently, the "unbeliever's" thinking results in ignorance; in his darkened futile mind Eph 4:17, 18 he actually hates knowledge Pr 1:22 and can gain only a "knowledge" falsely so-called. 1 Tim 6:20
e. To the extent that he actually knows anything, it is due to his unacknowledged dependence upon the suppressed truth about God within him. This renders the "unbeliever" intellectually schizophrenic: by his espoused way of thinking he actually "op­poses himself" and shows a need for a radical "change of mind" (repentance) unto a genuine knowledge of the truth. 2 Tim 2:25
f.   The "unbeliever's" ignorance is culpable because he is without excuse for his rebellion against God's revelation; hence he is "without an apologetic" for his thoughts.
g. His "unbelief" does not stem from a lack of factual evidence but from his refusal to submit to the authoritative word of God from the beginning of his thinking. Lk 16:31
 
The Requirements of the Apologist:

1.  The apologist must have the proper attitude; he must not be arro­gant or quarrelsome, but with humility and respect he must argue in a gentle and peaceable manner. James 3:13
2. The apologist must have the proper starting point Jn 14:6 ; he must take God's word as his self-evidencing presupposition, Mt 7:29
thinking God's thoughts after Him Ps 36:9 (rather than attempting to be neutral), and view­ing God's word as more sure than even his personal experience of the facts. 2 Pet 1:16-19
3.   The apologist must have the proper method; working on the "unbeliever's" unacknowledged presuppositions and being firmly grounded in his own Col 2:3,6,7 , the apologist must aim to cast down every high imagination exalted against the knowledge of God by aiming to bring every thought (his own, as well as his opponent's) captive to the obedience of Christ. 2 Cor 10:4,5
4. The apologist must have the proper goal: securing the "unbeliever's" unconditional surrender 2 Cor 10:5 without compromising one's own fidel­ity.
a. The word of the cross must be used to expose the utter pseudo-wisdom of the world as destructive foolishness, 1 Cor 1:18-20
b.  Christ must be set apart as Lord in one's heart, thus acknowl­edging no higher authority than God's word and refusing to suspend intellectual commitment to its truth. 1 Pet 3:15

The Procedure for Defending the Faith:

1. Realizing that the "unbeliever" is holding back the truth in unrighteous­ness Rom 1:18 , the apologist should reject the foolish presuppositions im­plicit in critical questions and attempt to educate his opponent. 2 Tim 2:23-25
2. This involves presenting the facts within the context of the Biblical philosophy of fact:
a. God is the sovereign determiner of possibility and impossibility. Acts 26:8
b. A proper reception and understanding of the facts requires sub­mission to the Lordship of Christ. Acts 26:9-15
c. Thus the facts will be significant to the "unbeliever" only if he has a presuppositional change of mind from darkness to light. Acts 26:19-20
d. Scripture has authority to declare what has happened in history and to interpret it correctly. Acts 26:22-23, 27
3. The "unbeliever's" espoused presuppositions should be forcefully at­tacked, asking whether knowledge is possible, given them: 
a. In order to show that God has made foolish the wisdom of the world the believer can place himself on the "unbeliever's" posi­tion and answer him according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceits; that is, demonstrate the outcome of "unbelieving" thought with its assumptions. Pr 26:5
b.  The "unbeliever's" claims should be reduced to impotence and impossibility by an internal critique of his system; that is, dem­onstrate the ignorance of "unbelief" by arguing from the impos­sibility of anything contrary to Christianity. 1 Cor 1:20; Pr 26:5; Mt 7:26-27
4.  The apologist should appeal to the "unbeliever" as the image of God Gen 1:26 who has God's clear and inescapable revelation, thus giving him an ineradicable knowledge of God Rom 1:18-21
; this knowledge can be exposed by indicating unwitting expressions or by pointing to the "bor­rowed capital" (un-admitted presuppositions) which can be found in the "unbeliever's" position.
5.   The apologist should declare the self-evidencing and authoritative truth of God Jn 5:37, 39; Is 8:20; Jn 17:17 as the precondition of intelligibility and man's only way of salvation (from all the effects of sin, including ignorance and intellectual vanity) Jn 14:6 :
a.   Lest the apologist become like the "unbeliever", he should not answer him according to his folly but according to God's word, Pr 26:4
b. The "unbeliever" can be invited to put himself on the Christian position in order to see that it provides the necessary grounds for intelligible experience and factual knowledge—thereby con­cluding that it alone is reasonable to hold and the very founda­tion for proving anything whatsoever. Col 2:3
c.  The apologist can also explain that Scripture accounts for the "unbeliever's" state of mind (hostility) Col 1:21 and the failure of men to acknowledge the necessary truth of God's revelation Rom 1:18; Ps 14:1; moreover, Scripture provides the only escape from the effects of this hos­tility and failure (futility and damnation). Eph 4:17-24; 1 Cor 3:18-20; Mt 7:24-29


bit.ly/Apologetic