"If you make up a story that isn't true, handing it down over a number of centuries doesn't make it any truer!" —RICHARD DAWKINS
Apparently Louisiana agrees and passed the first antievolution "academic freedom" law called Louisiana Science Education Act recently. There is something very wrong with evolutionary logic.
If evolution was true then the DNA instruction would have to "increase" and that is just not evident in nature.
VERY IMPORTANT! Evolution is about an increase of instructions in the DNA.
The processes we observe tend to decrease the instructions in the DNA. It's the opposite of evolution. Natural selection actually reduces DNA instruction, adaptation loses instruction. It's the opposite of evolution. It's not logical.
Mutations are a lose of instruction also. Some of the instructions get's lost and a mutation occurs. It's the opposite of evolution.
Poodles have so many mutations that causes so many problems for them. How can you possibly think that a Wolf evolved into a poodle? A more accurate description would be to call it devolve? By the lose of instruction you see mutations to go from a good stock of a wolf to a putrid horribly deformed, mutated, disease prone poodle, the problems are apparent. OK so I don't like poodles, move on.
Mutations are beneficial at times because it helps the species survive like that Heike Crab, because of the superstition that Japanese fisherman had. It helped magnify the mutation. If a face on a crab can be considered a mutation. Lets say an insect loses it's wings on a very windy island the mutation is beneficial to keep the insect grounded and it reproduces a lot and magnifies the mutation. The mutation was originally a lose of instruction not a gain.
Mutations and natural selection is going in the wrong direction then evolution. There is nothing being added.
There are various mutations of DNA, for example, Point Mutation, Frame-shift mutation, Deletion, Insertion, Inversion, DNA expression mutation. For this discussion I want to talk about Insertion mutation which is what evolution is claiming happens.
Evolution: to evolve, to gain new instructions, right?
Only with an insertion mutation, it generally results in a nonfunctional protein. Even worse, If I understand correctly, also an insertion mutation often creates a frame shift mutation and can make the DNA meaningless and often results in a shortened protein. So again how is evolution is evident in science?
Here is something that I know you all will enjoy, it states the case quite well. I choose Ray and Kirk because I know how most of you feel about the two and I am emulating God. 1 Corinthians 1:27
We need to bear in mind that anyone who claims science "proves" anything as "true" (like evolution) misunderstands the basic tenets of the scientific method.